Materials and Methods: The data of 98 patients who underwent radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion with the diagnosis of non-metastatic bladder cancer between 2015 and 2023 were retrospectively screened. The groups of patients who underwent extraperitonealization of the ileal conduit with radical cystectomy and traditional radical cystectomy were evaluated comparatively in terms of perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications.
Results: Forty-five patients who underwent cystectomy with ileal conduit extraperitonealization technique and 53 patients who underwent ileal loop diversion with traditional cystectomy were evaluated comparatively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics and duration of surgery. In the group that underwent cystectomy with extraperitonealization of the ileal conduit technique, the return of the normal gas pattern and the dwell time of the nasocracymic tube were statistically significantly shorter than the group that did not (p=0.017, p=0.023). The average length of hospital stay was 7.2 days in the extra-peritonealization group and 14.1 days in the group that did not undergo extraperitonealization, and this period was significantly shorter in the extraperitonealized group (p=0.013). There were no complications requiring reoperation in the extraperitonealized group.
Conclusion: In radical cystectomy and ileal loop cutaneous urinary diversion, extraperitonizing the ileal segment reduces postoperative intestinal complications.
Ten percent of the patients with urinary diversion performed using the ileal loop or gastric segment suffer from postoperative bowel obstruction that requires reoperation [5]. Mechanical ileus requiring reexploration has been reported at an incidence rate of 10.5 percent [6]. Studies have been conducted to improve early return of bowel functions with resultant decrease in bowel-related complications [7]. In a Cochrane review, the effect of prokinetic agents on intestinal complications was investigated. According to the results of the study, some drugs shortened bowel passage time by accelerating intestinal motility and also reduced the length of hospital stay [8]. Reyblat et al. investigated patients who developed neurogenic bladder after spinal cord injury and therefore underwent extraperitoneal augmentation enterocystoplasty. Compared to intraperitoneal surgery, bowel-related complications had been less frequently seen in the patient group in which extraperitoneal technique was applied [9].
Herein, we aimed to comparatively evaluate bowel complications after radical cystectomy performed using traditional cystectomy vs peritoneal closure-assisted ileal conduit extraperitonealization technique.
In our study, the duration of surgery, the amount of blood loss, blood transfusion rates and postoperative complications were evaluated. Postoperative surgical complications and adverse events of both groups were defined using the Clavien- Dindo complication classification.
Surgical Technique
The peritoneal layer was incised up to the level of the
common iliac artery before the dissection of lymph nodes.
After the distal cutaneous and proximal ureteral anastomoses
of the ileal loop segment were performed, the peritoneal layer
was closed over and sutured to the ileal segment to achieve
extraperitonealization.
Statistical Analysis
Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics ver.
25 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, US) software package. The
normality of the distribution of continuous variables and the
assumption of homogeneity of variances were examined using
the Shapiro-Wilk test and Levene"s test, respectively. Descriptive
statistics were presented as mean ± standard deviation or median
(minimum-maximum) for continuous variables, and as the
number of cases and percent values for categorical variables.
Following goodness-of-fit tests, the statistical significance of
intergroup differences in terms of continuous variables that
did and did not comply with parametric test assumptions were
evaluated by chi-square and Student"s t-test vs Mann-Whitney
U test, respectively.
Both cohorts were statistically similar in terms of operation times. (216 minutes for extraperitonealization vs. 223 minutes for non-extraperitonealization group) (Table 2). Estimated blood loss and transfusion rates were similar between both cohorts. Postoperative bowel-related complications were observed in 7 patients in the traditional cystectomy group, and 5 patients in the group that underwent reoperation due to mechanical ileus. Extraperitonealization was associated with paralytic ileus in only one patient, and no complications requiring reoperation were observed. In the ileal conduit extraperitonealization group, the transition to normal diet was earlier than in the traditional cystectomy group. Along with gas and fecal discharge, the time to normal bowel motility was also shorter in the non-extraperitonealization group (2.6 vs. 6.5 days, p=0.017). No delay in transition to oral diet or abdominal pain was observed in the group of patients who underwent extraperitonealization. The dwell time of nasogastric tube was significantly shorter in the extraperitonealization group (p=0.023), and the average length of hospital stay for the extraperitonealized group was 7.2 days, significantly shorter than the non-extraperitonealization group.
In the metanalysis of postoperative ileus, Noble et al., demonstrated that gum chewing had reduced the duration of postoperative ileus [7]. Traut et al. found that prokinetic agents reduced rates of prolonged ileus and thus the length of hospital stay [8].
An extraperitoneal technique was described by Reyblat et al., to reduce bowel-related complications during augmentation enterocytoplasty and this technique has been shown to facilitate early postoperative recovery [9]. The results of this study suggested that postoperative intestinal obstruction rates could be reduced by restructuring the pelvic floor. After removal of the bladder during radical cystectomy, a cavity is formed in the pelvis. The sigmoid colon and omentum cannot adequately fill this gap. In the empty space formed in the pelvis, the small intestine segments are compressed and cause obstruction. Preservation of the peritoneal structure can prevent the segments of the small intestine from being pinched in this area, reducing the likelihood of mechanical ileus requiring re-exploratory abdominal surgery.
Mandhani et al. reported shorter hospital stays, earlier recovery, and fewer bowel-related complications in a series of radical cystectomies performed using the technique involving extraperitonealization of the orthotopic neobladder [16].
Dong So Park et al. described a technique in which the neobladder is extraperitonealized during radical cystectomy and orthotopic diversion. They also found that bowel-related complications were reduced using this peritoneal membrane preservation technique. They suggested that this technique is a feasible approach in selected patients and significantly reduces bowel-related complications [17].
Unlike the studies in the literature, our study investigated the effect of extraperitonealization of the ileal conduit on complication rates in patients undergoing cystoprostatectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion. When the results of our study were examined, it was determined that the improvement in early bowel function was faster in radical cystectomies performed by extraperitonealizing the ileal loop segment compared to patients who did not undergo extraperitonealization. Refraining from the complication of mechanical ileus in the group of patients with extraperitonealized ileal loop conveys critical importance in terms of avoiding the indication of reoperation due to mechanical bowel obstruction.
Ethics Committee Approval: The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Afyonkarahisar University of Health Sciences Clinical Research Ethics Committee (ethics committee approval date and number: 03.03.2023/153). Informed Consent: An informed consent was obtained from all the patients.
Publication: The results of the study were not published in full or in part in form of abstracts.
Peer-review: Externally and internally peer-reviewed.
Authorship Contributions: Any contribution was not made by any individual not listed as an author. Concept – B.B., B.E.; Design – B.B.; Supervision – B.B.; Resources – B.E.; Materials – B.B., B.E.; Data Collection and/or Processing – B.B.; Analysis and/or Interpretation – B.B.; Literature Search – B.E., B.B.; Writing Manuscript – B.B., B.E.; Critical Review – B.B.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Financial Disclosure: The authors state that they have not received any funding.
1) Hautmann RE, Abol-Enein H, Davidsson T, Gudjonsson S,
Hautmann SH, Holm HV, et al. International Consultation
on Urologic Disease-European Association of Urology
Consultation on Bladder Cancer 2012. ICUD-EAU
International Consultation on Bladder Cancer 2012: Urinary
diversion. Eur Urol. 2013;63(1):67-80.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.050
2) Lawrentschuk N, Colombo R, Hakenberg OW, Lerner SP,
Månsson W, Sagalowsky A, et al. Prevention and management
of complications following radical cystectomy for bladder
cancer. Eur Urol. 2010;57(6):983-1001.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.024
3) Nazmy M, Yuh B, Kawachi M, Lau CS, Linehan J, Ruel NH,
et al. Early and late complications of robot-assisted radical
cystectomy: a standardized analysis by urinary diversion
type. J Urol. 2014;191(3):681-7.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.022
4) Hollenbeck BK, Miller DC, Taub D, Dunn RL, Khuri SF,
Henderson WG, et al. Identifying risk factors for potentially
avoidable complications following radical cystectomy. J
Urol. 2005;174(4 Pt 1):1231-7; discussion 1237.
http://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000173923.35338.99
5) Azzouni F. Current status of minimally invasive radical
cystectomy: an outcome-based comparison. Expert Rev
Anticancer Ther. 2013;13(6):681-95.
http://doi.org/10.1586/era.13.59
6) Varkarakis IM, Chrisofos M, Antoniou N, Papatsoris
A, Deliveliotis C. Evaluation of findings during reexploration
for obstructive ileus after radical cystectomy
and ileal-loop urinary diversion: insight into potential
technical improvements. BJU Int. 2007;99(4):893-7.
http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06644.x
7) Noble EJ, Harris R, Hosie KB, Thomas S, Lewis SJ. Gum
chewing reduces postoperative ileus? A systematic review
and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2009;7(2):100-5.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.01.006
8) Traut U, Brügger L, Kunz R, Pauli-Magnus C, Haug K,
Bucher HC, et al. Systemic prokinetic pharmacologic
treatment for postoperative adynamic ileus following
abdominal surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2008;(1):CD004930.
http://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004930.pub3
9) Reyblat P, Chan KG, Josephson DY, Stein JP, Freeman
JA, Grossfeld GD, et al. Comparison of extraperitoneal
and intraperitoneal augmentation enterocystoplasty for
neurogenic bladder in spinal cord injury patients. World J
Urol. 2009;27(1):63-8.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-008-0351-3
10) Shabsigh A, Korets R, Vora KC, Brooks CM, Cronin
AM, Savage C, et al. Defining early morbidity of
radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer
using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol.
2009;55(1):164-74.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.031
11) Novara G, De Marco V, Aragona M, Boscolo-Berto R,
Cavalleri S, Artibani W, et al. Complications and mortality
after radical cystectomy for bladder transitional cell
cancer. J Urol. 2009;182(3):914-21.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.032
12) Brunocilla E, Pernetti R, Martorana G. The role of pelvic
lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy for
bladder cancer. Anticancer Res. 2011;31(1):271-5.
http://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/31/1/271.long
13) Konety BR, Allareddy V, Herr H. Complications after
radical cystectomy: analysis of population-based data.
Urology. 2006;68(1):58-64.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.051
14) Schiavina R, Borghesi M, Guidi M, Vagnoni V, Zukerman
Z, Pultrone C, et al. Perioperative complications
and mortality after radical cystectomy when using a
standardized reporting methodology. Clin Genitourin
Cancer. 2013;11(2):189-97.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2012.12.003
15) Guillotreau J, Gamé X, Mouzin M, Doumerc N, Mallet R,
Sallusto F, et al. Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer:
morbidity of laparoscopic versus open surgery. J Urol.
2009;181(2):554-9; discussion 559.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.011