Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1844 bladder cancer patients treated at our center between 2018 and 2022. Among them, 59 patients with histologically confirmed VUC were included. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan– Meier analysis, and prognostic factors were evaluated via multivariable Cox regression models.
Results: The most common VUC subtypes were squamous (39%), micropapillary (23.7%), and sarcomatoid (6.8%). The median overall survival (OS) was 11 months, while cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 7 months. Micropapillary and sarcomatoid variants exhibited significantly poorer CSS, with an approximately 8-fold and 7-fold increased mortality risk compared to squamous subtype, respectively. Age and the presence of metastases were key predictors of worse CSS. While radical cystectomy was performed in 30.5% of patients, it did not significantly improve survival.
Conclusion: Our findings underscore the aggressive nature of micropapillary and sarcomatoid VUC subtypes, highlighting the need for individualized treatment approaches. Age and metastatic status were significant determinants of survival, emphasizing the necessity for early diagnosis and targeted therapeutic strategies. Future research should explore molecular profiling and novel treatment modalities, including immunotherapies, to improve patient outcomes.
These variants are often associated with advanced disease stages, aggressive clinical behavior, and distinct treatment responses. Emerging evidence from international studies highlights significant heterogeneity in survival outcomes among patients with these VH. For instance, the five-year overall survival rates for patients with micropapillary and neuroendocrine variants are reported to be as low as 35% and 25%, respectively, compared to nearly 60% in those with pure UC [3,4]. This variation underscores the need for an in-depth understanding of the prognostic differences among these subtypes to inform clinical management strategies.
Despite these findings, much of the existing literature lacks direct comparative analyses of survival metrics across VH. Furthermore, factors such as cohort heterogeneity, variability in diagnostic practices, and limited representation of rare subtypes often impede the generalizability of results. This study aims to bridge these gaps and contribute to the literature to guide treatment approaches by systematically examining survival outcomes across variant bladder tumor histologies.
Our study aimed to determine the survival of patients with variant UC (VUC) and to analyze the factors affecting survival. Understanding these differences could yield critical insights into disease biology and improve prognostication and therapeutic decision-making.
The specimens of patients diagnosed with VUC were independently confirmed by a pathologist, with patient information and original pathological diagnoses blinded. Demographic, radiological, and pathological characteristics of the patients were recorded. All patients with visceral metastasis identified on cross-sectional imaging also had lymph node metastasis. Patients with isolated lymph node metastasis were categorized into the "cN+" group, while those with both lymph node and visceral metastasis were included in the "cM+" group. Survival data were obtained using the records from the central population registry system.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics
for Windows, version 25.0. The data are expressed as mean ±
standard deviation (SD). Differences in categorical variables
were assessed with the Chi-square test, while Student's t-test was
employed for continuous variables. Kaplan–Meier curves were
utilized to estimate overall survival, and the log-rank test was
applied to determine statistical significance. Binomial regression
analysis was conducted to identify predictors of mortality. A
p-value of less than 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.
Radical cystectomy was performed in 18 (30.5%) patients after the initial diagnosis. Systemic chemotherapy was planned for 14 (23.7%) patients with lymph nodes and 13 (22.1%) patients with solid organ metastasis. 14 (23.7%) patients did not accept early radical cystectomy at the non-muscle invasive stage.
Table 1. Baseline characteristic of patients according to type of variant histology
In our study with a mean follow-up period of 29 months, the median overall survival (OS) of the patients was 11 [interquartile range (IQR):34, min-maximum (min-max):1-97] months. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 7 [IQR:10, min-max:1-65] months. Overall and cancer-specific survival graphs of variant subgroups are shown in Figure 2. The median OS (95% confidence interval) of squamous, micropapillary, sarcomatoid, and other variant subtypes were 13(9-19), 12(5-65), 3(2-3) and 10(3-20) months, respectively. Cancer-specific survival was 40(11-40), 12(5-65), 3(2-3), 14(4-54) months in the same order.
Age was a risk factor for cancer-specific survival (HR: 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.11; p= 0.045), but not for overall survival (HR: 1.03; 95% CI 0.98-1.07; p0.153). The cancer-specific mortality risk for the micropapillary variant was nearly eightfold higher compared to the squamous subtype. Cancer-related mortality was 7 times higher in the sarcomatoid variant and 5 times higher in the other variants. Detection of lymph node or solid organ metastasis on cross-sectional imaging did not affect overall survival but was found to affect cancer-specific survival (Table 2).
In this study, we evaluated the outcomes of patients diagnosed with VH of bladder cancer and showed that micropapillary and sarcomatoid types, in particular, had worse cancer-specific survival than the most common squamous type. These findings are consistent with the existing literature, which highlights the prognostic importance of histological variants and their correlation with adverse pathological features. When evaluating VUC, it is necessary to consider that each variant may have a very different prognosis from each other as each variant has different dynamics.
The squamous variant of UC, while less aggressive than micropapillary or sarcomatoid types, presents a variable prognosis depending on the extent of the disease. In our study, the squamous variant accounted for 39% of all variant cases and was predominantly associated with localized disease at diagnosis. Cancer-specific survival for squamous variants in our cohort was similar to that reported in other studies, with 5-year survival rates ranging from 40% to 60%, depending on the stage at diagnosis [10]. The literature suggests that squamous differentiation frequently arises in response to chronic inflammation or infection, such as recurrent urinary tract infections or prolonged catheterization, which may explain its localized presentation in many cases [11]. However, conflicting data exist, with some studies indicating worse outcomes for higher-stage squamous variants, including a significant association with lymphovascular invasion and advanced pathological staging [12].
Micropapillary UC is a rare yet notably aggressive variant, constituting 0.6-2.2% of all UCs. This variant is characterized by early lymph node involvement and high-stage disease at diagnosis. In our cohort, micropapillary UC exhibited an approximately eight-fold higher cancer-specific mortality risk compared to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). These results align with existing literature, which identifies micropapillary UC as having significantly worse survival outcomes than conventional UC, with five-year overall survival rates as low as 35% in some studies [13,14]. The clinical management of micropapillary UC remains a challenge. Radical cystectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy is the cornerstone of treatment. However, the high propensity for early metastasis underscores the need for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, evidence supporting this approach is limited, and future prospective studies are needed to evaluate its efficacy [15,16] In our study, according to the literature, in 5 (35%) patients who could undergo radical cystectomy, the operation did not provide a statistically significant contribution in terms of OS or CSS.
The sarcomatoid variant of UC, as demonstrated in our study, represents one of the most aggressive histological subtypes. This variant accounted for 6.8% of all cases and was characterized by advanced pathological features, including a 75% rate of visceral metastasis at diagnosis. Multivariable analyses revealed that the sarcomatoid variant was associated with a seven-fold increased risk of cancer-specific mortality. In comparison, literature reports indicate a similarly poor prognosis, with 5-year survival rates often below 20% and a high likelihood of lymphovascular invasion and systemic spread [17]. Tumor size and unifocal presentation were notable features in our cohort, with all sarcomatoid tumors measuring ≥3 cm and 75% being unifocal, aligning with reports that highlight their rapid growth and localized dominance [18]. Sarcomatoid UC poses distinct challenges due to its aggressive nature and frequent metastasis at diagnosis. Standard therapies such as radical cystectomy are often inadequate due to the aggressive nature of the disease and its metastatic nature at the time of diagnosis. New therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, show promise, especially given the high tumor mutation burden observed in upper urinary tract UC, especially in sarcomatoid variants. However, further research is needed to establish standardized treatment protocols and to evaluate the efficacy of new therapeutic approaches [19].
Other rare variants, including plasmacytoid, nested, and clear cell subtypes, were also analyzed. The plasmacytoid variant is associated with high metastatic potential, while the nested variant often poses diagnostic challenges due to its resemblance to benign lesions. In our study, patients with these subtypes showed varied survival outcomes, reflecting the heterogeneity of these entities. Nested UC, for instance, can mimic non-invasive UC, complicating early detection and treatment [18,20].
Our analysis identified age as a significant risk factor for cancer-specific survival but not for overall survival. This finding is consistent with studies suggesting that even elderly patients with pure UC have diminished physiological reserves to withstand aggressive disease and treatment regimens [21]. Additionally, the presence of lymph nodes or solid organ metastases at diagnosis adversely affected cancer-specific survival. Kim et al. analyzed 424 patients who underwent radical cystectomy+lymph node dissection for VUC and found that 92 patients (21.7%) had histological positive lymph node involvement. In the LN positive group, histological variants of UC were a significant independent prognostic factor of overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 3.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.77-7.08, p <0.001) and cancer-specific survival (HR 3.66; 95% CI 1.69-7.90, p =0.001) in both uni-variate and multivariate Cox regression analyses [22]. Our study is consistent with literature highlighting metastasis as a critical determinant of prognosis.
A key strength of our study lies in the detailed sub-analysis of variant UC subtypes, enabling a nuanced understanding of their prognostic implications. Furthermore, the confirmation of diagnoses by an independent pathologist enhances the reliability of our findings. However, the study's retrospective design and relatively small sample size, particularly for rare subtypes, limit the generalizability of the results. Larger multicenter studies are needed to validate our findings and explore potential therapeutic targets.
Ethics Committee Approval: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Ethics committee approval date and number: 26.01.2022/2011-KAEK-25 2022/01-19.
Informed Consent: An informed consent was obtained from all the patients.
Publication: The results of the study were not published in full or in part in form of abstracts.
Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.
Authorship Contributions: Any contribution was not made by any individual not listed as an author. Concept – M.K., A.E.; Design – M.K., A.E.; Supervision – M.D.; Resources – M.Ö.; Materials – M.Ö.; Data Collection and/or Processing – M.K., M.Ö.; Analysis and/or Interpretation – A.E.; Literature Search – M.K., D.B.; Writing Manuscript – M.K., D.B., A.E.; Critical Review – M.B.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declare that this study received no financial support.
1) Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M,
Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics
2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of ıncidence and mortality
worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J
Clin 2021;71(3):209-49.
https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
2) Alfred Witjes J, Lebret T, Compérat EM, Cowan NC, De
Santis M, Bruins HM, et al. Updated 2016 EAU guidelines
on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. Eur
Urol 2017;71(3):462-75.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.020
3) Aron M. Variant histology in bladder cancer-current
understanding of pathologic subtypes. Curr Urol Rep
2019;20(12):80.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-019-0949-6
4) Black AJ, Black PC. Variant histology in bladder cancer:
diagnostic and clinical implications. Transl Cancer Res
2020;9(10):6565-75.
https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-2169
5) Lobo N, Shariat SF, Guo CC, Fernandez MI, Kassouf W,
Choudhury A, et al. What is the significance of variant
histology in urothelial carcinoma? Eur Urol Focus
2020;6(4):653-63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2019.09.003
6) Shah RB, Montgomery JS, Montie JE, Kunju LP.
Variant (divergent) histologic differentiation in urothelial
carcinoma is under-recognized in community practice:
impact of mandatory central pathology review at a large
referral hospital. Urol Oncol 2013;31(8):1650-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.04.009
7) Dursun F, Elshabrawy A, Wang H, Wu S, Liss MA,
Kaushik D, et al. Histological variants of non-muscle
invasive bladder cancer: survival outcomes of radical
cystectomy vs. bladder preservation therapy. Urol Oncol
2022;40(6):275.e1-275.e10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.02.004
8) Monn MF, Kaimakliotis HZ, Pedrosa JA, Cary KC, Bihrle
R, Cheng L, et al. Contemporary bladder cancer: variant
histology may be a significant driver of disease. Urol
Oncol 2015;33(1):18.e15-18.e20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.10.001
9) Hsieh MC, Sung MT, Chiang PH, Huang CH, Tang Y, Su
YL. The Prognostic impact of histopathological variants
in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. PLoS One
2015;10(6):e0129268.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129268
10) Minato A, Noguchi H, Tomisaki I, Fukuda A, Kubo T,
Nakayama T, et al. Clinical significance of squamous
differentiation in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.
Cancer Control 2018;25(1):1073274818800269.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1073274818800269
11) Tang Q, Xiong G, Li X, Fang D, Xi C, Zhang L, et al.
The prognostic impact of squamous and glandular
differentiation for upper tract urothelial carcinoma
patients after radical nephroureterectomy. World J Urol
2016;34(6):871-7.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1715-0
12) Elawdy MM, Taha DE, Elbaset MA, Abouelkheir RT,
Osman Y. Histopathologic characteristics of upper tract
urothelial carcinoma with an emphasis on their effect on
cancer survival: a single-institute experience with 305
patients with long-term follow-up. Clin Genitourin Cancer
2016;14(6):e609-e615.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2016.04.017
13) Cheng YT, Luo HL, Sung MT, Chiang PH. Micropapillary
variant of urothelial carcinoma: a report of 4 cases and
literature review. Chang Gung Med J 2010;33(4):461-5.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20804677/
14) Amin MB. Histological variants of urothelial carcinoma:
diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic implications. Mod
Pathol 2009;22 Suppl 2:S96-S118.
https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2009.26
15) Willis DL, Flaig TW, Hansel DE, Milowsky MI, Grubb
RL, Al-Ahmadie HA, et al. Micropapillary bladder cancer:
current treatment patterns and review of the literature.
Urol Oncol 2014;32(6):826-32.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.01.020
16) Deuker M, Stolzenbach LF, Collà Ruvolo C, Nocera L,
Mansour M, Tian Z, et al. Micropapillary versus urothelial
carcinoma of the urinary bladder: stage at presentation and
efficacy of chemotherapy across all stages-A seer-based
study. Eur Urol Focus 2021;7(6):1332-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2020.08.010
17) Lopez-Beltran A, Pacelli A, Rothenberg HJ, Wollan
PC, Zincke H, Blute ML, et al. Carcinosarcoma and
sarcomatoid carcinoma of the bladder: clinicopathological
study of 41 cases. J Urol 1998;159(5):1497-503.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199805000-00023
18) Lopez-Beltran A, Cheng L, Raspollini MR, Canas-
Marques R, Scarpelli M, Cimadamore A, et al. Variants of
bladder cancer: the pathologist"s point of view. European
Urology Supplements 2017;16(12):210-22.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eursup.2017.09.004
19) Anraku T, Hashidate H, Nakahara A, Imai T, Kawakami
Y. Sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis
treated with immunotherapy. BMC Urol 2023;23(1):38.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01210-z
20) Cox R, Epstein JI. Large nested variant of urothelial
carcinoma: 23 cases mimicking von Brunn nests and
inverted growth pattern of noninvasive papillary urothelial
carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2011;35(9):1337-42.
https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e318222a653