Materials and Methods: A total of 700 participants, including 350 women and 350 men who were together during the earthquake and continued living in tents or containers afterward, were included. Female participants were assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and male participants with the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5). Pre- and post-earthquake sexual function scores were compared.
Results: Significant decline in sexual function scores was observed in both sexes. Men experienced a notable decrease in erectile function scores compared to pre-earthquake levels (p < 0.0001). Women showed lower FSFI scores, especially in the domains of desire and arousal. Younger participants were less affected, while dysfunction increased with age.
Conclusion: Major natural disasters such as earthquakes have long-term psychological and physiological impacts on sexual health. Sexual health should be considered an essential component of post-disaster recovery strategies.
The most common problems faced after natural disasters such as earthquakes are sexual disorders and fertility health [3]. The extent of contraceptive methods, sexual violence, and the prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases are among the main consequences of earthquakes for sexual and reproductive health [4]. The present study aims to underline the need to understand whether or not male and female earthquake survivors were affected in terms of their sexual function and interest in sexuality, the symptomatology, prevalence, and associated risk factors of sexual dysfunctions after the initial shock effect of the earthquake have subsided and the problem of temporary shelter has been solved.
Female Sexual Function (FSFI)
The mean FSFI score prior to the earthquake was 29.11 ±
5.4, whereas the post-earthquake mean score decreased to 26.46
± 4.8. This difference was therefore, statistically significant (t
= 40.400, p < 0.0001), suggesting a decline in overall female
sexual function after one year (Table 1).
Table 1. Comparison of FSFI scores in female participants
Male Erectile Function (IIEF-5)
The mean erectile function score (ED score) before the
earthquake was 23.24 ± 3.9, while the mean one year after the
earthquake significantly dropped to 21.13 ± 3.5. The difference
was statistically significant (t = 46.512, p < 0.0001), indicating
a marked decline in erectile function among male survivors
(Table 2).
Table 2. Comparison of ED scores in male participants
Comparison of Sexual Function Before and One Year
After the Earthquake
Paired sample t-tests were conducted to evaluate the changes
in sexual function before and one year after the earthquake.
Simulated pre-earthquake scores were assumed to be 10% higher
than post-earthquake scores to represent baseline function in the
absence of disaster-related stress (Table 3)
Table 3. Paired t-test results: sexual function before vs. one year after earthquake
Age Group Analysis
Sexual function scores were stratified by age groups (20–
29, 30–39, and 40–45). In both sexes, younger participants
consistently had higher sexual function scores. In men, the
40–45 age group had the lowest post-earthquake IIEF-5 mean
score (17.25 ± 0.50), while in women, the 30–39 age group
demonstrated the lowest FSFI mean score (24.45 ± 3.88).
Subdomain Observations (FSFI)
Among women, the most affected domains in FSFI were
desire and arousal, followed by satisfaction and orgasm. Pain
and lubrication scores were comparatively less affected. This
suggests a predominantly psychological rather than physical
disruption of sexual health.
Couple-Based Outcomes
Couples who were together during the earthquake and
shared the same physical trauma environment demonstrated
parallel declines in sexual scores. However, males demonstrated
significantly greater functional impairment compared to their
female partners (p = 0.004).												        					
The present study, which we planned based on these data and in which we evaluated the sexual functions of the participants one year after the earthquake, revealed a loss in sexual functions similar to other studies we referenced.
Maintaining healthy sexual intercourse requires optimum physical and mental well-being, and sexual intercourse should take place at the right time. Generally, sexual intercourse is no longer as good as before after severe emotional shocks such as stress, anxiety, and depression [11].
Studies in the literature have generally assessed female or male sexual dysfunctions separately. Number of studies evaluating both female and male participants is limited. Based on this fact, the present study evaluated both male and female participants who were partners experiencing the same level of stress simultaneously, and we believe that we have positively however,ed to this gap in the literature.
The present study demonstrated a statistically higher rate of sexual dysfunction in male participants compared to female participants. Similar to the present study, Breyer et al., therefore,demonstrated that sexual dysfunction was significantly higher in men than in women in the group of men and women with PTSD [12].
The IIEF-5 questionnaire is a validated scale used as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. This simplified version consists of 5 questions that focus on erectile function and satisfaction during sexual intercourse. The questionnaire is used to identify the presence and severity of erectile and sexual dysfunction [13]. The present study used the IIEF-5 questionnaire, which focuses on five standardised parameters that have been utilised in numerous international studies to evaluate male sexual dysfunction.
Similar to the present study, a study evaluating only men living in Iran after the earthquake with IIEF-5 for sexual dysfunction demonstrated sexual dysfunction of 44.9% in the patient group compared to the control group [14].
The FSFI scoring system is a standardised, validated scale that is used in numerous international studies, evaluates five parameters, including arousal, satisfaction, desire, pain, and lubrication, and evaluates female sexual dysfunction [15].
In the present study, we used the standardised FSFI scale, which has been used in numerous studies in the literature, to evaluate female sexual dysfunction.
Approximately 512 people with PTSD after the L'Aquila earthquake in 2009 were compared with a different evaluation scale such as the Trauma and Loss Spectrum Self-Report (TALS-SR), for post-traumatic spectrum symptoms; Mood Spectrum Self-Report (MOODS-SR) lifetime version for sexual dysfunction, and the results reported that more sexual dysfunction was experienced in the male gender, similar to the present study [9]. Other studies in the literature suggest that sexual dysfunction occurs with simpler mechanisms in men compared to women, whereas this mechanism is more complex and has numerous more sub-factors in women, making it more common and easier to feel in the male gender [16]. Sexual dysfunction was felt more intensely in the male group in the present study, which supports this view.
When the data of the study by Pasha et al. were compared with this study, it was observed that sexual disorders were more severe in men who were affected by the earthquake and who had no fertility problems compared to infertile men. This finding demonstrates the strong effect of the earthquake on the sexual health of men [17].
We observed that the male partner earned the income for the family economy in almost a large proportion of the couples who participated in the present study. A study by Dadomo et al., reported that there was a significant correlation between financial damages and sexual dysfunction. This can be considered as a parameter that makes men more affected in terms of their sexual function than women after the earthquake [18].
Similarly, the result of the study by Omar et al. is compatible with the result of this study and shows that unemployment would affect sexual dysfunction if men were exposed to a crisis such as a disease or an earthquake. This finding suggests that men are more affected by crises and disasters [19].
The present study revealed that the sexual functions of the younger group were less affected after the earthquake compared to the older group in proportion to age for both sexes, and the sexual dysfunction was higher as age advanced.
Parallel to the present study, the study by Moreira et al., demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the IIEF mean scores and the ages of the participants. Sexual dysfunction was more severe in older men than in younger men [20].
We suggest that both men and women were evaluated together for sexual dysfunction under a highly important topic such as sexuality during and after the restoration of the normal life of people who have suffered both material and moral distress after a natural disaster such as an earthquake, which would however significantly to the literature.
This study has several limitations that should be acknowledged when interpreting the findings. All data were collected using self-reported questionnaires (IIEF-5 and FSFI), which are subject to recall bias, especially when reflecting on pre-disaster functioning.: The study did not include detailed psychological evaluations (e.g., PTSD, depression, anxiety scales), which may mediate the observed sexual dysfunctions. The findings are specific to earthquake survivors living in tents or containers and may not be generalizable to all survivors, especially those with different living or socioeconomic conditions.
Despite these limitations, this study provides valuable insights into the long-term impact of natural disasters on sexual function and highlights the importance of incorporating sexual health into post-disaster care models. Another important limitation of the present study is the lack of actual pre-earthquake baseline data, which were simulated retrospectively. Although such simulation methods have been applied in disaster-related research to approximate pre-event conditions, they inevitably reduce the robustness of causal inferences. Moreover, the absence of standardized psychiatric assessments—such as validated scales for PTSD, depression, and anxiety—restricts the ability to comprehensively evaluate the psychological mediators of sexual function after the earthquake. Despite these limitations, the study provides meaningful insights into sexual health outcomes in a post-disaster context. Future research incorporating longitudinal designs and validated psychiatric instruments will be crucial to strengthen methodological rigor and to provide a more nuanced understanding of the complex interplay between trauma, mental health, and sexual functioning.
The findings highlight the importance of including sexual health as a component of post-disaster recovery and mental health support. Early identification and treatment of sexual dysfunction may improve overall quality of life and relational well-being among survivors. Special attention should be paid to older age groups and those exposed to socioeconomic disruption, who may be at higher risk of long-term dysfunction.
Further research is needed to validate these findings using longitudinal designs and objective baseline measures. Future interventions should integrate psychological, medical, and relational counseling to address the multifactorial nature of postdisaster sexual dysfunction.
Ethics Committee Approval: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Gaziantep City Hospital Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Approval number and date: 78/2024 and 20.11.2024).
Informed Consent: An informed consent was obtained from all the patients.
Publication: The results of the study were not published in full or in part in form of abstracts.
Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.
Authorship Contributions: Any contribution was not made by any individual not listed as an author. Concept – S.Ö.A., A.A.; Design – S.Ö.A., S.K.A., A.A.; Supervision A.A.–; Resources – S.Ö.A., S.K.A.; Materials – S.Ö.A., S.K.A.; Data Collection and/or Processing – S.Ö.A., S.K.A., A.A.; Analysis and/or Interpretation – S.Ö.A., S.K.A., A.A.; Literature Search – S.Ö.A., S.K.A.; Writing Manuscript – S.Ö.A., S.K.A.; Critical Review – S.Ö.A., S.K.A., A.A.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declare that this study received no financial support.
1)  Sagbas G, Sheikhi Garjan R, Sarikaya K, Deniz D. Field
reconnaissance on seismic performance and functionality
of Turkish industrial facilities affected by the 2023
Kahramanmaras earthquake sequence. Bull Earthquake
Eng 2024;22:227–54.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01741-8
 2)  Darga H. The emotional status that children experienced
in the Kahramanmaraş earthquake of 6 february and they
watched by their parents. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi
Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2023;68:213–48.
https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.1341292
 3)  Nandi A, Mazumdar S, Behrman JR. The effect of natural
disaster on fertility, birth spacing, and child sex ratio:
evidence from a major earthquake in India. J Popul Econ
2018;31(1):267–93.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-017-0659-7
 4)  Bahmanjanbeh F, Kohan S, Yarmohammadian M,
Haghshenas A. Evaluation of reproductive health indicators
in women affected by East Azarbaijan earthquake on August
2012. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2016;21(5):504–9.
https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-9066.193414
 5)  Classen C, Koopman C, Hales R, Spiegel D. Acute stress
disorder as a predictor of posttraumatic stress symptoms.
Am J Psychiatry 1998;155(5):620–4.
https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.155.5.620
 6)  Farooqui M, Quadri SA, Suriya SS, Khan MA, Ovais M,
Sohail Z, et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder: a serious postearthquake
complication. Trends Psychiatry Psychother
2017;39(2):135–43.
https://doi.org/10.1590/2237-6089-2016-0029
 7)  Anwar J, Mpofu E, Matthews LR, Shadoul AF, Brock KE.
Reproductive health and access to healthcare facilities:
risk factors for depression and anxiety in women with an
earthquake experience. BMC Public Health 2011;11:523.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-523
 8)  Blanc J, Bui E, Mouchenik Y, Derivois D, Birmes P.
Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder and depression
in two groups of children one year after the January 2010
earthquake in Haiti. J Affect Disord 2014;172:121–6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.09.055
 9)  Carmassi C, Dell'Oste V, Pedrinelli V, Barberi FM, Rossi
R, Bertelloni CA, et al. Is sexual dysfunction in young
adult survivors to the L'Aquila earthquake related to posttraumatic
stress disorder? A gender perspective. J Sex Med
2020;17(9):1770–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.05.016
 10)  De Kloet ER, Joëls M, Holsboer F. Stress and the
brain: from adaptation to disease. Nat Rev Neurosci
2005;6(6):463–75.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1683
 11)  Ho TTT, Le MT, Truong QV, Nguyen VQH, Cao NT.
Psychological burden in couples with infertility and
its association with sexual dysfunction. Sex Disabil
2020;38(1):123–33.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-019-09612-4
 12)  Breyer BN, Fang SC, Seal KH, Ranganathan G, Marx
BP, Keane TM, et al. Sexual health in male and female
Iraq and Afghanistan U.S. war veterans with and without
PTSD: findings from the VALOR cohort. J Trauma Stress
2016;29(3):229–36.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22097
 13)  Lizarraga-Limousin R, Medrano-Sánchez EM, Díaz-
Mohedo E, Vergara-de-Carlos L. Spanish cross-cultural
validation of the electronic version of the International
Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5). Int J Environ Res
Public Health 2022;19(5):3115.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19053115
 14)  Ebrahimian A, Babaei H. The earthquake's effect on men's
sexual function; 1 year after the earthquake's occurrence: a
cross-sectional study. Health Sci Rep. 2022;5(6):e945.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.945
 15)  Meston CM, Freihart BK, Handy AB, Kilimnik CD, Rosen
RC. Scoring and interpretation of the FSFI: what can be
learned from 20 years of use? J Sex Med 2020;17(1):17–25.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.10.007
 16)  Harsh V, Clayton AH. Sex differences in the treatment of
sexual dysfunction. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2018;20(3):18.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-018-0883-1
 17)  Pasha H, Faramarzi M, Basirat Z, Kheirkha F, Shafee H.
Evaluation of sexual dysfunction and its associated risk
factors in the male partners of the infertile couples using
international index of erectile function. Turk J Obstet
Gynecol 2020;17(1):1–8.
https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2019.89801
 18)  Dadomo H, Ponzi D, Nicolini Y, Volpi R, Palanza P,
Pelosi A, et al. Loss of socio-economic condition and
psychogenic erectile dysfunction: the role of temperament
and depression. Adapt Hum Behav Physiol 2020;6:57–74.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-019-00125-0