Materials and Methods: The patients were divided into two groups as those who did (Group 1), and did not (Group 2) need DJ stent insertion. The age, symptoms, diagnosis, hemogram parameters, and treatment results of the patients were evaluated.
Results: Forty-nine percent (n=44) of the patients were female and 51% (n=46) were male. The groups did not differ in terms of age and gender (p>0.05). A higher incidence of hematuria was observed in Group 1 (p<0.05). WBC (p<0.05), NLR (p<0.05), and monocyte counts (p<0.05) were found to be higher in Group 1. In the ROC analysis; WBC and NLR were found to be two predictive markers for the need for DJ stent insertion. At a cut-off value of 12.6 x 109/L, WBC had 37% sensitivity, and 81% specificity (AUC: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.54-0.80), and at a cut-off value of 3.8, NLR had 65% sensitivity, and 76% specificity (AUC: 0.70; 95%CI: 0.57-0.82) in predicting the need for a DJ stent insertion. Reoperation was not required in any case.
Conclusion: In cases of ureteral stones, the absolute WBC count and NLR may help determine the requirement (if any) for a double-J stent insertion.
Often the best treatment alternative for urolithiasis is chosen depending on the size, location, composition of the stone and anatomy of the urinary system. Along with the advancement of endoscopic technology, the primary surgical approach for the management of urinary stones has also changed over time, moving from open surgery to less invasive techniques [4,5]. In extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), external shock waves are focused directly on the stone. Both kidney and ureteral stones may be treated using this approach. On the other hand, many ureterorenoscopy-guided (URS) contact lithotripsy methods, including laser, ultrasound, and pneumatic lithotripsy may be used for this purpose. When imaging fails to facilitate the procedure or cannot be done during ESWL in children with stones larger than 4 mm, DJ stent insertion is primarily employed [6,7].
The use of DJ stents after URS therapy is still debatable. In this research, we have aimed to investigate whether the absolute WBC, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), absolute monocyte counts, and other laboratory markers may help determine the need for double-J stent insertion in cases of ureteral stones.
Surgical Procedure
All patients who presented to the emergency department
with flank pain underwent physical, ultrasonographic, and
radiological examinations, and their CRP values and hemogram
parameters were evaluated. Among them, patients with ureteral
stones were hospitalized. After adequate hydration, patients
with persistent stones detected in the control ultrasonography
underwent URS. After URS, DJ stent was inserted in patients
with proper indications (patients who developed edema or
excessive edema due to large stones). No additional procedure
was applied to the patients who did not need DJ stent insertion.
Inclusion Criteria
Among patients aged 0-18 years with complete retrospective
medical data and diagnosed, and treated in our clinic, those
who had undergone surgery for ureteral stones were included
in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
Patients aged >18 years with comorbidity and/or urinary
extravasation and inconsistent retrospective data were excluded
from the study.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyzes including descriptive statistics,
frequencies, and other statistical methods were performed for all
patient data. Continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard
deviation. Continuous variables were analyzed with the Shapiro-
Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests to determine whether
the data had a normal distribution. Continuous and normally
distributed variables were compared using Student's T-test. Nonparametric
tests were used for the data that did not fit the normal
distribution. In case of need, categorical variables were evaluated
with a chi-square test and some other data with Fisher's exact
test. Correlation between data was checked with Pearson and
Spearman correlation tests. Binary logistic regression tests were
used for the analysis of risk factors and indications for DJ-stent
insertion. Analyzes were performed using SPSS Statistics for
Windows, Version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Table 1. Analysis of the patients and characteristics
In the ROC analysis; WBC and NLR were found to be the predictive markers for the need for DJ stent insertion (Figure 1). At a cut-off value of 12.6 x 109/L WBC had 37% sensitivity, and 81% specificity (AUC: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.54-0.80), and a cutoff value of 3.8, NLR had 65% sensitivity, and 76% specificity (AUC: 0.70; 95%CI: 0.57-0.82) in foreseeing the need for DJ stent insertion (Table 2).
Table 2. Suggested cut-off values and diagnostic value
Any correlation could not be found between stone size and NLR or WBC (p>0.05). Reoperation was not required in any
Inflammatory responses have been recently linked to kidney and ureter stones. Biomarkers for inflammatory diseases include C-reactive protein (CRP) and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Immune cells play an important role in the inflammatory process throughout the human body. Multiple studies have pointed to the NLR as a significant indicator of kidney stone formation. The spontaneous passage of a ureteral stone was correlated negatively with both NLR and PLR. However a recent research disproved the hypothesis suggesting that inflammatory biomarkers like NLR and PLR are linked to the spontaneous passage of ureteral stones [13].
As is shown in various research studies, diseases progressing with inflammation had higher total WBC, NEU, and monocyte counts [14]. According to Halaseh et al., NLR, LMR, and monocyte counts should be taken into consideration as diagnostic parameters in patients with suspected complex appendicitis [15]. According to Kriplani et al., NLR, PLR, and LMR may be independent, accessible, and cheap predictors for early detection of SIRS/sepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) [16].
Considering the literature data cited so far, predictive value of the NLR and the absolute WBC count for the need for DJ stent insertion in pediatric patients with urolithiasis has been investigated for the first time in our study.
In the present study, we have found higher WBC (p<0.05) and monocyte counts (p<0.05) in Group 1. However, any correlation could not be found between stone size and NLR or WBC (p>0.05). As a result; in the ROC analysis; WBC and NLR were found to be two predictive markers for the need for a DJ stent insertion after URS in pediatric patients. For WBC, a cut-off value of 12.6 x 109/L had 37% sensitivity, and 81% specificity (AUC: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.54-0.80), and for NLR, a cutoff value of 3.8 had 65% sensitivity, and 76% specificity, (AUC: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.57-0.82) as predictive markers for the need for a DJ stent insertion after ureterolithotomy in pediatric patients.
Limited number of patients included in our study, and retrospective analysis of only the data of the patients who applied to the pediatric surgery service of Dicle University Medical Faculty Hospital were the most important limitations of our study.
Ethics Committee Approval: The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Dicle University Medical Faculty (approval date and number: 28.02.2023/60).
Informed Consent: An informed consent was obtained from all the patients.
Publication: The results of the study were not published in full or in part in form of abstracts.
Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.
Authorship Contributions: Any contribution was not made by any individual not listed as an author. Concept – S.A., M.A., T.O.K.; Design – S.A., M.A., T.O.K.; Supervision – S.A., M.A., T.O.K.; Resources – E.B., B.A., M.H.O., M.K.; Materials – E.B., B.A., M.H.O., M.K.; Data Collection and/or Processing – E.B., B.A., M.H.O., M.K.; Analysis and/or Interpretation – S.A., M.A., T.O.K.; Literature Search – E.B., B.A., M.H.O., M.K.; Writing Manuscript – S.A., M.A., T.O.K.; Critical Review – S.A., M.A., A.Ö. Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Financial Disclosure: The authors state that they have not received any funding.
1) Sasmaz MI, Kirpat V. The relationship between the severity of
pain and stone size, hydronephrosis and laboratory parameters
in renal colic attack. Am J Emerg Med 2019;37:2107-10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.06.013
2) McSorley ST, Drury M, Majumdar P, Halsala A, Nalagatla
SK. C-reactive protein to predict the need for surgical
intervention in acute renal colic. J Clin Urol 2014;7:380-3.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2051415813495679
3) Angulo JC, Gaspar MJ, Rodríguez N, García-Tello A, Torres
G, Núñez C. The value of C-reactive protein determination
in patients with renal colic to decide urgent urinary
diversion. Urology 2010;76:301-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.12.002
4) Abou Heidar N, Labban M, Bustros G, Nasr R. Inflammatory
serum markers predicting spontaneous ureteral stone
passage. Clin Exp Nephrol 2020;24:277-83.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-019-01807-5
5) Westerdijk K, Simons KS, Zegers M, Wever PC, Pickkers P, de
Jager CPC. The value of the neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio in
the diagnosis of sepsis in patients admitted to the Intensive Care
Unit: A retrospective cohort study. PLoS One 2019:14(2):e0212861.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212861
6) Han SY, Lee IR, Park SJ, Kim JH, Shin JI. Usefulness of
neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in young children with febrile
urinary tract infection. Korean J Pediatr 2016;59:139-44.
https://doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2016.59.3.139
7) Elsaraya N, Gordon-Irshai A, Schwarzfuchs D, Novack V,
Mabjeesh NJ, Neulander EZ. Neutrophil to lymphocyte
ratio as an early indicator for ureteral catheterization in
patients with renal colic due to upper urinary tract lithiasis.
PLoS One 2022;17:e0270706.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270706
8) Duyan M, Vural N. Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of
Novel Biomarkers in Adult Patients With Acute Appendicitis:
A Cross-Sectional Study. Cureus 2022;14:e32307.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32307
9) Çekmen B, Bildik B, Atiş ŞE, Güven H. The role of
neutrophil-albumin ratio in the diagnosis of acute
appendicitis and its efficacy in predicting perforation. Ulus
Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2022;29:52-8.
https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2022.56570
10) Falchi D, Bakır AC, Risteski T, Tziam HA, Yüksel S,
Azizoğlu SI. Diagnostic Value of The Ischemia Modified
Albumin and Pentraxin 3 In Pediatric Appendicitis: A Meta
Analysis. J Clin Trials Exp Investig 2022;1:1-9.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6857498
11) Aydoğdu B, Azizoğlu M, Arslan S, Aydoğdu G, Basuguy
E, Salık F, et al. A Novel Diagnostic Scoring System for
Pediatric Appendicitis Based on Age and Sex-Adjusted
Hematological Parameters. Gac Med Mex 2023;159:103-9.
https://doi.org/10.24875/GMM.M22000753
12) Basuguy E, Okur MH, Arslan S, Aydoğdu B, Akdeniz S,
Azizoğlu M. Our results of thoracoport-aided laparoscopic
appendectomy in children. Dicle Med J 2020:47:727-34.
https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.800307
13) Di X, Liu S, Xiang L, Jin X. Association between the
systemic immune-inflammation index and kidney stone:
A cross-sectional study of NHANES 2007-2018. Front
Immunol 2023;14:1116224.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1116224
14) Ucar Karabulut K, Erinanc H, Yonar A, Kisinma A, Ucar
Y. Correlation of histological diagnosis and laboratory
findings in distinguishing acute appendicitis and lymphoid
hyperplasia. Ann Surg Treat Res 2022;103:306-11.
https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2022.103.5.306