Materials and Methods: The medical records of all patients who underwent varicocelectomy due to grade 2 or 3 clinical varicocele were reviewed. Examined parameters included patient demographic characteristics and preoperative CBC parameters [hemoglobin, white blood cell, platelet, mean platelet volume (MPV) and platelet distribution width (PDW)]. Patients without varicocele, active infection and vascular disorders constituted the control group.
Results: The study population consisted of 61 patients with varicocele and 62 control subjects. The mean age of the patients was 28.6 ± 6.2 years. Mean preoperative hemoglobin, WBC, platelet, MPV and PDW were 15.5 ± 1 g/dL, 7.5±1.6 x103/μL, (236 ± 53.4) x103/μL, 9.3±1.1 (fL) and 15.2± 3.9 (%), respectively. There was no difference between patients with varicocele and control subjects in terms of age, mean preoperative Hb, WBC and MPV. However, mean preoperative platelet count was significantly lower and mean PDW was significantly higher in varicocele patients compared to controls (p<0.05).
Conclusion: We found that PDW is significantly higher in varicocele patients compared to controls. Thus, PDW might be a practical tool in the confirmation of varicocele diagnosis and also be utilized at follow-up after varicocelectomy.
In this study, we aimed to determine if complete blood count (CBC) parameters especially platelet count and volume indices could be a practical tool in the diagnosis and follow-up of varicocele.
Statistical Analysis
IBM SPSS statistical package programme v.21 for Mac
(Armonk, NY, USA)was used. Quantitative variables were
given as mean ± standard deviation and qualitative values were
shown in numbers and percentages. Comparison of variables
between two groups was made by using Mann-Whitney U tests.
Statistical significance was set as P <0.05
Vascular change and platelet indices may be useful for detecting or screening subclinical varicocele [2]. Platelet indices such as mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW) and thrombocytecrit (PCT) are standard indicators of platelet function in the pathophysiology of diseases [9]. MPV is an important marker of platelet size and activation. However, the results of the studies on this subject in the literature are contradictory. In a study by Cüce et al., MPV values were found to be significantly higher in patients with varicocele than those without (P = 0.010), but no statistically significant relationship was found between grade of varicocele and MPV and RDW values [4]. Bozkurt et al. stated that the increase in MPV was due to the varicocele disease and that the increase in the degree of varicocele was associated with higher MPV in varicocele patients [8]. In concordance with the aforementioned studies Coban et al. found that MPV values were significantly higher in the varicocele group, and platelet and PDW values were significantly lower than in the control group [1]. In another study, in contrast with our study, when the platelet (PLT), MPV, PCT and PDW values of the varicocele and the non-varicocele groups were compared, a significant increase was observed in MPV (p = 0.003), but no difference was observed in the platelet count or platelet indices [3].
In another study by Polat et al.,platelet counts or indices represented no difference between the groups with and without varicocele in terms of MPV, PDW and PCT [9]. Mahdavi et al. found that platelet volume indices [PVI (MPV, PDW, and P-LCR)] was higher in varicocele patients compared to normal healthy controls [10]. In our study, no significant difference was observed between the groups with and without varicocele in terms of MPV, while the mean preoperative PDW value was found to be significantly higher in those with varicocele.
Our study is also not without limitations. One of the main limitations of the study is that the study is its retrospective design. In addition, the small number of patients and the fact that we did not measure other platelet indices like (platelet-large cell ratio (PLCR) and platelet-large cell concentration (PLCC) and platelet activation markers such as beta-thromboglobulin and platelet factor IV might be considered among the other limitations of our study.
Ethics Committee Approval: The study was approved by Higher Specialization Training and Research Hospital Medical Specialty Education Board (TUEK), Cankaya, Ankara, Turkey (Decision No: 15 March, 2018/29620911-929).
Informed Consent: An informed consent was obtained from all the patients.
Publication: The results of the study were not published elsewhere in full or in part in form of abstracts.
Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.
Authorship Contributions: Any contribution was not made by any individual not listed as an author. Concept – M.Y., M.K., C.C., S.T.; Design – M.Y., M.K., C.C., S.T.; Supervision – M.Y., M.K., C.C., S.T.; Resources – M.Y., M.K., C.C., S.T.; Materials – M.Y., M.K., C.C., S.T.; Data Collection and/ or Processing – M.Y., M.K., C.C., S.T.; Analysis and/or Interpretation – M.Y., M.K., C.C., S.T.; Literature Search – M.Y., M.K., C.C., S.T.; Writing– M.Y., M.K., C.C., S.T.; Critical Review – M.Y., M.K., C.C., S.T.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that theyhave no conflict of interest.
Financial Disclosure: The authors have declared that they did not receive any financial support for the realization of this study.
1) Çoban S, Keleş I, Biyik I, Güzelsoy M, Türkoğlu AR,
Özgünay T, et al. Is there any relationship between mean
platelet volume and varicocele? Andrologia 2015;47:37–41.
https://doi.org/10.1111/and.12220.
2) Pyo JS, Cho WJ. Mean Platelet Volume, Platelet
Distribution Width, and Platelet Count in Varicocele:
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cell Physiol
Biochem 2016;38:2239–46.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000445579.
3) Zhang QF, Liang JH, He TH, Huang ZX, Liu QL, Zhang
X, et al. Relationship between varicocele and platelet
indices: changes of mean platelet volume before and after
operation. Andrology 2019;7:846–51.
https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12605.
4) Cüce F, Demiray Ö, Küçük U, Olgun Küçük H.
Varicocele: Tissue stress in the etiology. Turkish J Med Sci
2016;46:1014–7.
https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1411-70.
5) Demirer Z, Karademir I, Uslu AU, Güragac A, Aksu Y.
The relationship between inflammation and mean platelet
volume in varicocele pathophysiology. Rev Int Androl
2018;16:137–42.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.androl.2017.06.005.
6) Kiliç S, Aksoy Y, Sincer I, Oǧuz F, Erdil N, Yetkin
E. Cardiovascular evaluation of young patients with
varicocele. Fertil Steril 2007;88:369–73.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.119.
7) Aslan R, Erbin A, Celik S, Ucpinar B, Sahinalp S,
Yıldızhan M, et al. Evaluation of hemorrhoidal disease
and lower extremity venous insufficiency in primary adult
varicocele: A prospective controlled study. Phlebology
2019;34:621–6.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355519834426.
8) Bozkurt Y, Soylemez H, Sancaktutar AA, Islamoglu Y, Kar
A, Penbegul N, et al. Relationship between mean platelet
volume and varicocele: A preliminary study. Urology
2012;79:1048–51.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.01.019.